By Milana Vinn
NEW YORK, Oct 14 (Reuters) – Anthropic’s third-quarter revenue rose 45% to $16.8 billion from the previous quarter, according to an investor who attended a pre-IPO meeting with Anthropic leadership in San Francisco on Wednesday.
Revenue in the first quarter was $4.7 billion, and $11.6 billion in the second quarter, according to the person who attended the investor day meant to familiarize prospective Anthropic investors before its highly anticipated IPO. The company was profitable on an adjusted basis in the third quarter, Anthropic told the group, the source said.
Anthropic did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
The IPO is expected to precede a public listing by rival OpenAI, making Anthropic an early test of investor appetite for heavily unprofitable AI developers pursuing massive scale. Its public-market debut is likely to be pushed until after the November US midterm elections, Reuters has reported.
Scrutiny of AI companies’ finances has intensified as they pour money into chips, data centers and computing power needed to develop and operate increasingly powerful models.
Targeting a valuation of over $2 trillion, Anthropic is seeking to convince investors that its breakneck revenue growth can eventually outrun the enormous costs of building and running AI systems.
Last year, Anthropic’s revenue increased twelvefold to nearly $4.6 billion, even as the company lost more than $8 billion on an operating basis, excluding writedowns of various liabilities mostly tied to previous fundraising, Reuters reported exclusively last month.
The company has committed at least $518 billion over a decade for cloud services, computing and infrastructure.
Founded by former OpenAI executives, Anthropic has emerged as one of the leading generative AI developers with its Claude family of models. Its expansion has been underpinned by Alphabet’s Google and Amazon, which are simultaneously investors, suppliers of computing power and important distribution partners, as well as AI competitors.
Anthropic has also sought to distinguish itself through its focus on AI safety, warning of the dangers posed by increasingly capable systems even as it competes in the race to develop and commercialize more powerful models.
Its research has found that its own AI agents have engaged in troubling behavior in test environments, including leaking sensitive information and sabotaging code, though the company has said it has not seen evidence of such misalignment in real-world deployments.
(Reporting by Milana Vinn in New York; Additional reporting by Anhata Rooprai in Bengaluru; Editing by Sayantani Ghosh, Sriraj Kalluvila and Matthew Lewis)
Comments